Every year, claims circulate that Christmas is nothing more than a baptized pagan festival. These arguments usually appear confident on the surface, yet they collapse under historical scrutiny. Early Christians did not adopt pagan worship, nor did they build their celebrations on the myths of Rome. The traditions surrounding the birth of Christ have deep roots in Scripture, Jewish expectation, and early Christian theology. The most common myths used to attack Christmas do not stand up to examination.
Myth One: Christmas Was Stolen From Saturnalia
Saturnalia was a Roman festival, but it bears no meaningful resemblance to the Christian celebration of the birth of Jesus. Saturnalia involved gambling, revelry, and social inversion that celebrated the temporary removal of social order. It did not honor a divine incarnation or reflect biblical prophecy in any way. There is no evidence that Christian leaders merged the birth of Christ with this feast. The claim is a modern assumption that ignores the historical record.
Myth Two: December 25th Was A Pagan Solar Festival
Many argue that Christians selected December 25th to replace a pagan sun festival. The historical record does not support this claim. The earliest celebrations of Christ’s birth on December 25th appear before the widespread observance of Sol Invictus. Early Christians used a Jewish pattern that linked conception and death to the same date. Many believed Jesus was conceived on March 25th, which places His birth nine months later on December 25th. This reasoning is theological, not pagan.
Myth Three: Yule Logs Show Christmas Is Pagan
A popular claim argues that the use of yule logs in some Christmas traditions proves that Christians borrowed from pagan worship. This argument does not hold up when the actual history is examined. The Christian use of the yule log and the pagan yule rites do not share a line of development. They are unrelated practices that both involve fire during winter, which is a normal human reality in cold climates rather than evidence of shared religious belief.
The Norse and Germanic Yule festivals belonged to northern cultures and never appeared in the early Christian world. There is no chain of transmission from these rites to the Christian observance of Christ’s birth. Early Christians in the Mediterranean did not practice anything resembling a yule log ceremony. Their climate, culture, and worship were different, and there was no contact point that could have imported a northern winter practice into the Christmas celebration.
The Christian yule log developed in medieval Europe because winter required substantial fuel. Families often saved their largest log for a communal gathering during the Christmas feast. Christians eventually attached theological meaning to the practice, often associating the warmth and light of the fire with Christ as the light of the world. This reflects Christian reflection, not pagan preservation. Similar winter practices appear across cultures because they arise from climate, not religion. The Christian yule log has no historical or theological connection to pagan worship.
Myth Four: Christmas Trees Are Pagan Symbols
Many claim that Christmas trees come from ancient pagan tree worship or that Jeremiah 10 condemns them. This is a misuse of Scripture and history. Jeremiah describes craftsmen carving idols from wood, covering them with metal, and fastening them upright so they will not fall. The passage condemns idolatry, not decorated evergreens. A carved and metal-covered idol is not the same as a Christmas tree.
Christmas trees appear in medieval Christian Europe more than a thousand years after Jeremiah. The tradition developed from paradise plays performed on December 24th, which used an evergreen to represent the tree of life in the story of Adam and Eve. Christian families adopted the evergreen as a reminder of creation, fall, and redemption. The tradition grew from Christian theology, not pagan worship.
Attempts to link Christmas trees to fertility cults rely on vague similarities without any historical connection. The Christmas tree is a late Christian tradition shaped by biblical imagery, not a survival of pagan religion.
Myth Five: Santa Claus Is A Pagan God In Disguise
Modern portrayals of Santa Claus often include troubling elements, such as portraying Santa as an all-knowing judge of human behavior or allowing him to overshadow the celebration of Christ. These distortions deserve critique. However, they do not make Santa pagan in origin.
The historical root of Santa Claus is Saint Nicholas, a fourth-century Christian bishop known for generosity, charity, and defense of Christian doctrine. His legacy continued for centuries, especially in regions that celebrated his feast on December 6th. When later European traditions blended and evolved, many cultural layers were added, but none of them transformed him into a rebranded pagan deity.
Claims that Santa derives from Odin or other mythological figures rely on superficial comparisons such as winter imagery or travel through the sky. There is no historical line connecting Saint Nicholas to a pagan god. The troubling features of modern Santa come from commercialism and cultural drift, not ancient paganism. His origin remains firmly Christian.
Myth Six: Gift Giving Comes From Pagan Rituals
Many cultures exchanged gifts, but Christian gift-giving at Christmas is not borrowed from pagan rites. The practice flows from the gifts brought by the Magi, the generosity of God in the incarnation, and the emphasis on charity found throughout early Christianity. When believers gave gifts, they did so as acts of mercy and a reflection of God’s nature. There is no evidence of any pagan influence behind the custom.
Myth Seven: Christmas Is Not In Scripture, So It Should Not Be Celebrated
Some argue that since Scripture does not command the celebration of Christ’s birth, Christians should avoid it. This reasoning misunderstands both Scripture and worship. The birth of Christ is presented as a moment of joy and revelation. Angels celebrated it. Shepherds celebrated it. The nations, represented by the Magi, celebrated it. It is entirely natural for believers to commemorate the incarnation, since it lies at the heart of the gospel.
This objection also ignores that Jesus Himself celebrated events not commanded in the Law of Moses. John 10 records Jesus attending the Feast of Dedication, known today as Hanukkah. This feast arose centuries after the Torah and was never mandated by God, yet Jesus participated because it honored God’s work in Israel’s history. His example shows that God-honoring celebrations are permissible even when not commanded.
Christmas fits this pattern. It honors the incarnation and reflects devotion to Christ, not a requirement. The claim that Christmas is wrong because it is not commanded is inconsistent with Scripture and with the example of Jesus.
Myth Eight: Early Christians Did Not Celebrate Christ’s Birth
Some claim that Christmas is a late invention, but early Christian writings point to sustained interest in the birth of Christ. By the second century, writers such as Clement of Alexandria mention attempts to calculate the date. By the early third century, Origen criticizes Christians for celebrating birthdays at all, which only makes sense if some were celebrating Christ’s birth already. By the fourth century, the nativity was celebrated in both Eastern and Western churches. The celebration developed organically from Christian devotion, not from pagan influence.
Myth Nine: Christmas Is A Blend Of Pagan Mysteries And Christianity
Critics often claim that Christian beliefs about Christ’s birth were borrowed from Greco-Roman mystery religions. The comparison does not withstand scrutiny. Mystery religions centered on secret initiations, symbolic reenactments of mythical deaths, and cyclical patterns of fertility and rebirth. None of these relates to the incarnation. The incarnation is a one-time historical event grounded in the Hebrew Scriptures, not a mythical cycle of nature.
Early Christians consistently rejected pagan mysteries. New Testament authors warn against pagan influence and frame Jesus as the fulfillment of the promises given to Abraham, David, and the prophets. Christian theology rests on the Old Testament, not on the dramas of mystery cults.
Most supposed parallels between Jesus and pagan deities come from late sources that postdate Christianity and reflect cultural misunderstandings rather than historical reality. Christmas celebrates the arrival of the promised Messiah. It does not borrow from pagan mysteries. The Jewish and biblical foundation of the celebration is unmistakable.
Myth Ten: Christmas Was Invented To Appease Pagans
A modern claim argues that early Christians created Christmas to make the faith more appealing to pagans. This theory contradicts the historical record. Early Christians refused to participate in pagan festivals, sacrifices, or public rituals. They faced imprisonment and death rather than compromise. A community so committed to resisting pagan culture would not create a holiday to attract pagan approval.
The earliest references to Christ’s birth celebration focus on theological reasoning, especially the belief that Jesus was conceived and died on the same date. Christian writers discussed the incarnation as a fulfillment of prophecy, not as a strategy to win converts.
The Church grew because it offered truth and hope that pagan religion lacked. Christmas arose from devotion to Christ and reflection on the incarnation, not from an attempt to blend Christianity with pagan practices.
Conclusion
The claim that Christmas is pagan has become a modern tradition of its own, repeated far more often than researched. The evidence shows that the celebration of Christ’s birth developed from Christian theology, Jewish thought patterns, and the devotion of early believers. Christmas is not a baptized pagan festival. It is a proclamation that the Word became flesh. Believers can celebrate with confidence, knowing that the holiday stands firmly on Christian foundations.
Discussion Questions
- How did early Christian theological reasoning, especially the idea that Jesus was conceived and died on the same date, influence the choice of December 25th as the celebration of Christ’s birth?
- In what ways does the accusation that Christmas was stolen from Saturnalia misunderstand both the nature of Saturnalia and the beliefs of early Christians?
- How does the misuse of Jeremiah 10 reveal common problems in modern debates about pagan origins, and what does the passage actually describe?
- Why is the argument that yule logs prove Christmas is pagan historically inaccurate, and what does the development of yule logs in medieval Christian Europe reveal about how traditions form?
- How does understanding the historical Saint Nicholas challenge modern claims that Santa Claus evolved from pagan gods, and what elements of the modern Santa should Christians evaluate more carefully?
- Why is it incorrect to assume that any winter custom with long standing cultural roots must automatically come from pagan religion, and how does this assumption distort historical interpretation?
- How does Jesus’ participation in Hanukkah demonstrate that God honoring celebrations can be legitimate even when they are not directly commanded in Scripture?
- In what ways do early Christian writings show genuine interest in the celebration of Christ’s birth, and how do these writings contradict claims that Christmas emerged centuries later?
- What are the main differences between the incarnation and the themes of Greco Roman mystery religions, and why do these differences make the claim of borrowing untenable?
- How does the willingness of early Christians to suffer persecution rather than participate in pagan rituals undermine the idea that Christmas was created to appeal to pagans?
Want To Know More
- Roll, Susan K. Toward the Origins of Christmas.
This scholarly study explores how early Christians began commemorating the birth of Christ. Roll’s research helps dismantle modern claims of pagan origins by grounding the development of Christmas in Christian theology and historical practice. - Talley, Thomas J. The Origins of the Liturgical Year.
Talley provides a detailed analysis of how Christian feasts developed, including the reasoning behind December 25th. His work shows that Christian theological reflection, not pagan syncretism, shaped the date. - Kelly, J. N. D. Early Christian Doctrines.
Kelly’s classic overview of early Christian theology grounds doctrines like the incarnation in Scripture and the early Church. This book supports the argument that Christmas flows from Christian belief, not pagan mythology. - Nothaft, C. Philipp E. Dating the Passion: The Life of Jesus and the Emergence of Scientific Chronology.
Nothaft examines the chronological methods used by early Christians. His work explains why March 25th was viewed as the date of the crucifixion and conception, which naturally led to December 25th as the birth date. - McGowan, Andrew. Ancient Christian Worship: Early Church Practices in Social, Historical, and Theological Perspective.
McGowan shows how early Christians worshiped, how they viewed pagan rituals, and why they kept strict boundaries between the two. His research undercuts claims that Christmas borrowed from pagan ceremonies. - Heiser, Michael S. The Unseen Realm: Recovering the Supernatural Worldview of the Bible.
Heiser demonstrates how Christian theology is rooted in the Old Testament and Second Temple Judaism. This reinforces that Christian celebrations arise from biblical foundations rather than from pagan parallels. - Lister, Rob. God Is Impassible and Impassioned: Toward a Theology of Divine Emotion.
Lister addresses the incarnation and divine nature, offering valuable insight into why the early Church emphasized the birth of Christ as a vital doctrinal truth worth commemorating. - Wilken, Robert Louis. The Christians as the Romans Saw Them.
Wilken provides a clear picture of how pagans viewed Christians and why Christians refused to participate in pagan worship. His work strongly counters modern claims that Christians adopted or adapted pagan rituals like Saturnalia or Sol Invictus. - McGowan, Andrew B. “How December 25 Became Christmas.” Bible History Daily, Biblical Archaeology Society, 2012.
This accessible scholarly article provides a concise summary of the historical reasoning behind December 25th. It is often referenced because it distills complex historical data into a clear narrative. - Nichols, Stephen J. For Us and for Our Salvation: The Doctrine of Christ in the Early Church.
Nichols explains how the early Church articulated and defended the incarnation. Understanding this doctrine shows why believers quickly came to honor Christ’s birth long before any alleged pagan parallels were imagined.
About the Author
