The debate between evolution and creation is usually framed as a conflict over origins, but that framing may be misleading. Rather than asking whether evolutionary mechanisms disprove creation, a more careful question is whether they might instead describe how created systems continue to function over time. Scripture never presents creation as static, frozen, or immune to change. It presents an ordered reality that endures. The question this lesson explores is whether evolution is better understood as a process of maintenance within creation rather than as an explanation for how creation came into being.
Creation Is Dynamic by Design
From the opening chapters of Genesis, creation is portrayed as active rather than inert. The earth brings forth life. Creatures multiply. Humanity cultivates and governs. Seasons cycle and environments shift. Stability in Scripture is not defined by immobility but by continuity of order. A world incapable of adapting to changing conditions would be fragile, not perfected. Change, when constrained and purposeful, is not a threat to design but a feature of it.
What Evolution Explains and What It Does Not
Observed evolutionary processes describe adaptation within existing biological systems. Mutation, selection, and variation operate on structures that already function. They reshuffle information. They do not explain the origin of life, the emergence of complex cellular machinery, or the existence of biological boundaries. Evolutionary processes only work because they are limited. Unconstrained mutation leads to collapse. Selection without boundaries destroys ecosystems. What we observe is regulated variation that preserves viability across generations.
Interdependence Requires Constraint
Living systems do not exist in isolation. Biology depends on chemistry. Chemistry depends on physics. Physics depends on constants that do not drift. Ecosystems require coordinated responses across species and environments. If evolutionary change were metaphysically unguided, independent systems would routinely lose compatibility. Instead, they remain interoperable across vast spans of time. Change preserves function rather than eroding it. That persistence of coherence is not explained by randomness. It is the very phenomenon that demands explanation.
Scripture Assumes Sustained Order
The biblical narrative does not portray God as a distant initiator who withdraws after creation. It consistently presents creation as upheld and governed. Life reproduces within limits. The earth yields within boundaries. Order persists even as conditions change. This framework leaves room for secondary causes without surrendering sovereignty. Evolutionary processes fit naturally here as mechanisms by which creation remains viable over time rather than as explanations for why creation exists at all.
Conclusion
If evolution is understood solely as an alternative to creation, the discussion stalls before it begins. But if it is approached as a description of how life adapts within an already ordered reality, a different possibility emerges. A universe in which change preserves life, function, and coherence is not easily explained by chance alone. Evolution may not answer the question of origin, but it raises a significant theological question of its own. Does the resilience of creation point away from design, or does it suggest that creation was structured to endure?
Discussion Questions
- How does reframing evolution as a description of maintenance rather than origin change the way Christians should approach the science–faith conversation?
- Why do evolutionary processes require constraints in order to preserve life, and what do those constraints suggest about the nature of the systems in which evolution operates?
- In what ways does the continued coherence between biological, chemical, and physical systems challenge purely material explanations of change over time?
- How does the biblical portrayal of God sustaining creation shape our understanding of change, adaptation, and continuity in the natural world?
- If evolution does not explain why life exists but describes how it endures, what theological questions does that raise about design, purpose, and governance?
Want to Know More
- Michael J. Behe, Darwin’s Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution
Behe examines complex biochemical systems at the cellular level and argues that their interdependent parts resist explanation by gradual, unguided processes alone. Whether one accepts his conclusions or not, the book is valuable for clarifying the difference between explaining how systems adapt once they exist and explaining how integrated systems capable of adaptation arise in the first place. - Stephen C. Meyer, Signature in the Cell: DNA and the Evidence for Intelligent Design
Meyer focuses on the origin of biological information, arguing that DNA’s information-rich structure raises questions that standard evolutionary mechanisms do not address. This work is especially relevant to the lesson’s distinction between origin and maintenance, pressing the reader to separate adaptation over time from the initial emergence of complex, functional information. - John C. Polkinghorne, Science and Creation: The Search for Understanding
Polkinghorne explores how scientific explanations and theological claims about creation relate without collapsing into either deism or scientism. He provides a strong conceptual framework for understanding secondary causes operating within an ordered and sustained creation, which aligns closely with viewing evolution as a process that preserves coherence rather than generating existence. - Alister E. McGrath, The Open Secret: A New Vision for Natural Theology
McGrath reworks natural theology around the intelligibility and coherence of the natural world rather than isolated gaps in scientific knowledge. His approach is useful for articulating why ongoing order, constraint, and interoperability can be theologically meaningful without treating science as a rival explanation for God. - Denis Alexander, Creation or Evolution: Do We Have to Choose?
Alexander addresses the false binary that forces Christians to choose between evolutionary science and belief in creation. While offering his own synthesis, he is particularly helpful in identifying where scientific description ends and metaphysical claims begin, making the book a useful conversation partner for framing evolution as maintenance within a created order.
About the Author
