In the shadows of swastikas and the thunder of marching boots, the Nazi regime gave birth to a religious movement that bore the name of Christ but not His Spirit. This movement, called Positive Christianity, was not a branch of Christian orthodoxy but a deliberate corruption designed to serve the ideological goals of Adolf Hitler. It weaponized Christian language to justify antisemitism, racial purity, and nationalistic supremacy. Despite its collapse with the Third Reich, its theological DNA continues to mutate and reappear, especially in modern claims that Jesus was not Jewish or that Christianity must be stripped of its Jewish roots.
This article explores how Positive Christianity functioned as a simulated religion, its direct assault on biblical Christianity, and how its legacy lingers in contemporary antisemitic rhetoric.
The Rise of a Counterfeit Faith
Positive Christianity was not created to honor Christ. It was crafted to harness His name for political control. It first appeared in the Nazi Party’s 1920 platform as a vague affirmation of Christianity “in a positive sense,” signaling a version of the faith that supported German nationalism while rejecting elements deemed “Jewish” or “decadent.” Over time, the Nazis clarified what this meant: a Christianity purged of its Semitic roots, its scriptural authority, and its gospel of grace.
Jesus, in this reimagined theology, was not a Jewish rabbi from Nazareth. He was portrayed as a heroic figure who stood against the corrupt Jewish establishment. This revision wasn’t born of theological inquiry. It was propaganda masquerading as piety. The Nazis aimed to preserve the aesthetic of Christianity while gutting its essence. In doing so, they rejected the authority of the Bible, replaced the gospel with blood-and-soil mysticism, and made the Church subordinate to the Führer.
The Theological Deconstruction of Christianity
Central to Positive Christianity was the rejection of the Jewish identity of Jesus. Nazi thinkers claimed that He was not part of the Jewish people, casting Him as a Galilean who opposed Judaism. By redefining Galilee as ethnically distinct, they attempted to sever Jesus from the history and promises of Israel.
This theological reconstruction allowed them to deny the Old Testament entirely, except for select passages that could be twisted to support Germanic ideology. The New Testament, particularly the writings of Paul, was treated with suspicion or discarded outright due to its message of grace and its embrace of Gentiles and Jews as equals. The cross, rather than being a symbol of divine self-sacrifice, was overshadowed by the glory of martyrdom for the state and racial destiny.
In this scheme, sin was not rebellion against a holy God, but anything that polluted the racial or national purity of the German people. Salvation came not through faith, but through loyalty to the regime. This was not Christianity. It was a blasphemous counterfeit.
Antisemitism as Doctrine
Positive Christianity was not passively antisemitic. It made antisemitism a theological imperative. The Jewish people were portrayed not as the covenant people through whom the Messiah came, but as enemies of truth and corrupters of religion. By recasting the gospel as a racial and spiritual battle between the Aryan spirit and Jewish influence, the Nazi regime justified its policies of segregation, persecution, and ultimately, extermination.
This perverse theology taught that the Jews had no place in God’s redemptive plan, that they were rejected entirely and permanently, and that the Church must cleanse itself of every Jewish element. It is no coincidence that this ideology marched hand-in-hand with the Holocaust. Theology was twisted into a tool of genocide.
Echoes in the Present: The Resurrection of an Old Lie
Though Positive Christianity died with the Third Reich, its theological corpse has been reanimated in modern antisemitic movements. Today, few people repeat the racial myth that Jesus was Aryan, but many argue that He was not ethnically Jewish because He was Galilean. The implication is that Galileans were somehow separate from Jews, and that Jesus therefore stood outside Jewish identity.
This claim is historically and biblically false. Galilee, while somewhat rural and geographically removed from Jerusalem, was a thoroughly Jewish region in the first century. The Gospels are clear that Jesus was born into a Jewish family, circumcised on the eighth day, kept the Torah, worshiped in synagogues, and celebrated Jewish festivals. In John 4:9, the Samaritan woman plainly identifies Him as a Jew. Paul affirms in Romans 9:5 that the Messiah came from the Jewish people “according to the flesh.”
The claim that Galileans were ethnically distinct is not just inaccurate. It is a recycled lie meant to achieve the same goal as the Nazi myth: to cut Christianity off from its Jewish roots, redefine Jesus in the image of a given culture, and open the door for antisemitic theology to flourish.
This lie appears in several places today. Fringe sects of Black Hebrew Israelite groups, some Islamic apologists, and various nationalist religious movements have all promoted the idea that the Jewish people are impostors and that Jesus belonged to some other lineage. While differing in language and audience, these modern claims echo the core impulse of Positive Christianity: to deny the Jewish people their role in God’s plan and to redefine Jesus as someone who belongs to us and not them.
The Biblical Response: Reclaiming the True Jesus
The New Testament proclaims that Jesus is the Jewish Messiah foretold in the Hebrew Scriptures. Matthew begins his Gospel by rooting Jesus firmly in the lineage of Abraham and David. Jesus affirms the Law and the Prophets and claims He came to fulfill, not abolish, them (Matthew 5:17). He teaches in synagogues, quotes Torah, and weeps over Jerusalem’s rejection of Him.
Paul’s epistles affirm that the gospel is “to the Jew first and also to the Greek” (Romans 1:16), and that Gentile believers are “grafted in” to the promises originally given to Israel (Romans 11). Revelation depicts the redeemed city with twelve gates, each bearing the name of a tribe of Israel. From beginning to end, the Scriptures present Jesus not as a universalized mythic figure, but as the incarnate God of Israel.
To follow Jesus is to embrace the story of Israel. It is to honor the promises made to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, and to recognize that God has not abandoned His people. Any attempt to rewrite this narrative is not just an error—it is a spiritual danger.
Conclusion: The Cross or the Lie
Positive Christianity replaced the cross with a lie. It elevated race over redemption, politics over truth, and hatred over love. It took the name of Jesus and used it to crucify His people all over again.
Today, when we hear that Jesus was not a Jew, or that Christianity should be divorced from the Old Testament, or that the Church has replaced Israel permanently, we must recognize the old spirit at work. These are not new ideas. They are recycled heresies born from hate.
Christians must be vigilant. We must hold fast to the truth that our Savior is the Jewish Messiah, and that our faith stands on the foundation of Israel’s Scriptures and promises. We must speak clearly: antisemitism in any form is a rejection of the gospel, a denial of Christ’s identity, and a betrayal of everything the cross stands for. To follow Christ is to love His people, honor His Word, and refuse every lie that seeks to sever Him from the story He came to fulfill.
Discussion Questions
- In what specific ways did Positive Christianity distort the identity and mission of Jesus Christ, and how did this serve the goals of the Nazi regime?
- Why is the Jewish identity of Jesus essential to the integrity of the Christian gospel, and what theological consequences arise when that identity is denied?
- How does the rejection of the Old Testament in movements like Positive Christianity affect the understanding of key Christian doctrines such as covenant, prophecy, and redemption?
- What are some modern examples of antisemitic theology or rhetoric that mirror the aims of Positive Christianity, even if unintentionally?
- How can the Church today guard against the reemergence of such distortions and ensure that its teachings remain rooted in the full counsel of Scripture, including its Jewish foundation?
Want to Know More?
- Susannah Heschel, The Aryan Jesus: Christian Theologians and the Bible in Nazi Germany
(Princeton University Press, 2008)
This groundbreaking academic work documents how Nazi theologians reimagined Jesus as non-Jewish and reshaped Christian doctrine to support Nazi ideology. Heschel, daughter of Jewish theologian Abraham Joshua Heschel, carefully traces the intellectual history of the German Christian movement and its role in promoting antisemitism through theology. - Eric Metaxas, Bonhoeffer: Pastor, Martyr, Prophet, Spy
(Thomas Nelson, 2010)
Metaxas provides a vivid biography of Dietrich Bonhoeffer, the German pastor who opposed the Nazi regime and its theological distortions. The book includes insight into the Confessing Church’s resistance against the German Christian heresy and Bonhoeffer’s unwavering commitment to biblical truth and the Jewish identity of Christ. - Joel Marcus, Jesus and the Holocaust: Reflections on Suffering and Hope
(Doubleday, 1997)
Marcus, a New Testament scholar, explores how Christian theology must grapple with the horrors of the Holocaust and its roots in centuries of antisemitic distortion. He highlights how denying the Jewishness of Jesus paved the way for atrocities and calls Christians to a renewed understanding of their Jewish Savior. - Daniel Boyarin, The Jewish Gospels: The Story of the Jewish Christ
(The New Press, 2012)
Boyarin, a Talmudic scholar, argues that the story of Jesus and the Gospels must be understood as deeply Jewish. While not writing from a Christian perspective, his work powerfully dismantles the myth that Jesus was somehow separate from Judaism and reinforces the Jewish matrix of early Christianity. - Church of England’s Faith and Order Commission, God’s Unfailing Word: Theological and Practical Perspectives on Christian–Jewish Relations
(Church House Publishing, 2019)
This official Church of England document addresses the relationship between Christians and Jews, repudiates replacement theology, and affirms the continuing place of the Jewish people in God’s redemptive plan. It provides a strong modern theological rebuttal to the ideas once promoted by Positive Christianity.
About the Author
